On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:34, Valentin Villenave wrote: > That being said, do you think it would be a good idea to make > TimeSignature accept the break-alignable-interface?
No, because TimeSignature already accepts an interface (break-aligned-interface) that determines its horizontal position; it wouldn't make sense for it to accept another one. The cleanest way of getting this functionality into the lilypond core, in my opinion, would be to create a whole new grob class. Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
