On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:34:43 -0500 (EST) Ralph Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Accidentals are only printed on tied notes which > > begin a new system: > > Each to his/her own I guess. > > In this case "that" is correct and "which" is incorrect. > To me, "which" sounds strange in this context. > It implies to me that tied notes begin a new system > *which* is, of course, untrue. :) I think that's a different meaning of "which". Hmm... if we had a comma before the "which", I'd buy into your reading. I think we're getting into silly territory here. (or rather, I think we wandered into silly territory about 8 emails ago :) > What people think of as strange or normal depends on their > common usage in spoken language I find. > > That's why you still see people writing > "there" instead of "they're" and > "where" instead of "we're". > > Don't even get me started on "its" :D No, those are clearly just idiots. Nobody whose [sic] intelligent can possibly disagree over those things. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
