On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:09:38 +0100 Nicholas WASTELL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the explanatory section linked from your example, you (I guess > it's you) say, 'Maybe rename section to "directions".' I think > 'Directions' is far too uninformative. 'Controlling direction' as a > minimum, or perhaps something along the lines of 'Controlling > position' or 'Controlling object placement'. (The word 'object' > needs a better alternative, though.) The advanced term is "grobs", but I'd rather avoid that here. For some reason I prefer "controlling direction" instead of "controlling placement", although I can't give any reason for this. I'm quite open to other naming suggestions. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user