On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting! However, as this example indicates, it's not > specific to articulations. We'll add info to LM 3 and > NR 3 about this. > > Since there's nothing specific about articulations here, we'll > remove it from NR 1.3. Just to be clear about this: -- In NR 1.3, we will only be explaining the \ syntax for articulations and ornamentations. -- The - syntax will only be explained for the `shorthands' Is this correct? Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
