On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:09:01 +0200 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentin Villenave wrote: > > > > If we decide to add "bowing indications" in Strings, we should > > consider adding "Breathing indications" to Wind instruments, > > shouldn't we? > > > I've often seen breathing indications both in string music as well as > vocal music. True. IIRC, it was pretty obvious how to get \breathe from NR 1.3 Expressive, though. Ditto for \downbow and \upbow. Perhaps we should introduce a @seealso in each NR 2.x which links to areas of NR 1 that are of particular interest? Hmm, actually that isn't ideal, since NR 1.3.x.y probably wouldn't include \downbow explicitly. Maybe add a "Constructs often used by" subsubsection, which gives specific examples (of bowing, breathing, etc) along with links to the earlier sections? As you all know, I'm not at all fond of duplication in the docs, but I'm having difficulty arguing that "String music" would be easier to understand if we omitted discussion of bowings. And artificial harmonics, for that matter -- those are covered in Pitches. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
