On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:48:41 -0700 "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > In NR 1.3.3.2, could we change the second snippet to read > > \arpeggioBracket > > <c e g c>\arpeggio > > \arpeggioNeutral > > <c e g c>\arpeggio > > to clarify the method of canceling the arpeggioBracket? (I had to > > dig through property-init.ly to convince myself that this was the > > correct way of doing it.) > > This is a good idea. Even though the \arpeggioNeutral command is seen > in the third example, it should probably appear earlier (in the second > example, as you suggest). I'll keep this in mind while I work on this > section. No, this isn't a good solution. There's no reason for \arpeggioNetural to cancel out \arpeggioBracket as well as the directions, especially since \*Neutral is the universal command for cancelling directions. Let's add \arpeggioWavy or something like that for cancelling \arpeggioBracket. I'm not enamored of the name, though. Any other suggestions? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
