On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:54:44 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote > > "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> We need a good (unique) heading. How about > >> > >> 2.3.1.1 References for bowed strings > > > > Let's do that; it's the shortest one. The other NR 2 sections > > will need similar headings. > > I've added these headings. In some cases it seemed more > appropriate to add the Refs heading at the subsection level, > others at the subsubsection level. See Draft 6. I would rather have them all at the subsubsection level; it's suprisingly easy to miss one or two subsections is everything else is at the subsubsection level. The reason that I keep on mentioning this is that people -- including me -- /have/ missed these in the past. If absolutely everything is at the subsublevel, then it avoids a potential problem of people who skim through docs quickly. IMO, these References are "common notation" anyway, so they would make sense in those subsections. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
