On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:55:11 +0200 "James E. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See, this is why I should subscribe to the development list___ If you're concerned about development, then yes. You might want to look at the archives, where you'll see a whole bloody MONTH for this discussion, multiple "if you have any objections, speak up now", etc. > Lilypond > syntax is really logical, this is a step in the illogical direction, > if you ask me. It's completely logical. Now, Up/Down/Both refer *only* to directions. Sustain isn't for directions. > I vote, as a pianist, for sustainDown/sustainUp. Who's with me? I vote, as one of the main developers, that there is no Maoing way we're going to revert this change. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
