On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:38 +1000 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Normal repeats: > I see you have an example with a partial alternative. Maybe you > should call attention to the \partial in the text, since this is > something that seems to come up on the user list regularly. The text already says " Repeats with upbeats can be entered in two ways: " What else would you propose? (or are you looking at something else?) > Now I know that the organisation of sections is something that has > been discussed a great deal, so if you have already thought about > this, please ignore my next comment: in the introduction, you mention > that repeats come in 4 types. Then you split up into *2* subsections. > Given the text of the introduction, it seems more natural to split > the section into 4 subsections (where the volta subsection would > split further into 2 more subsections). Yes, we spent a lot of time on this point already. - we only allow subsubsections; no subsubsubsections. - for purely aesthetic reasons, I dislike having a subsection with a single subsubsection. If I were willing to relax #2, I suppose we could have one subsection with the 4 main subsubsections, then a final subsection containing "manual repeat marks". I won't throw a fit if I happen to look at the lilypond docs a year from now and discover that somebody's done this, but for now I'd rather keep it as is and move on with other matters. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
