2008/7/30 Palmer, Ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think (speaking as a tyro regarding Scheme) the spaces make it easier
> for me to decipher on a first pass on a fairly simple piece of Scheme
> coding, and I would be surprised if they confused regular Scheme users.
> Therefore, my preference in the NR, would be to include spaces. I do
> confess to being unsure about exactly when and where spaces are required
> and where they are optional in LilyPond code. I will continue to use
> extraneous spaces in Scheme code unless someone makes an Executive
> Decision (to which I will comply).
When reading the various contiguous Scheme examples, I saw there were
mixed styles for spacing, I only noticed an aesthetic problem here.
> "where @var{musicexpr} is a music expression. Alternate endings can be
> produced using @code{\alternative}. [Begin added text] In order to
> delimit the alternate endings, the
> group of alternatives must be enclosed in a set of braces. [End added
> text.] If there are more repeats than
> there are alternate endings, the earliest repeats are given the first
> alternative.
>
> I think I would find it more confusing.
That's because you have never had to teach the alternative syntax to
absolutely non programmers. Anyway, it could be my fault, and it could
not to worth the effort.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
