> >> > if I need a `p espr.' mark, it's probably best (from a
> >> > typographical point of view) to write
> >> >
> >> > c\markup { \dynamic "p" \italic " espr." }
> >>
> >> No, this is not the best solution from a typographical point of
> >> view.
> >
> > It *is*, since it is one (abbreviated) phrase: `piano espressivo'
> > -- this is not the same as tagging the note with `piano', adding
> > `espressivo' somewhere else, say, on the top.
>
> Are you sure that the vertical alignment shouldn't be the same as a
> preceding hairpin in such a case?
Ah, I've misunderstood you. Yes, constructing a new dynamic sign
is good. However, there's still the problem with MIDI (which was my
main concern)...
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
