Patrick

I'm sorry, I should of course have acknowledged your work as well as Till's, and Andrew for reviewing it. Keeping track of who has done what is not proving easy :(

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond-User List" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: GDP NR 1.6 Staff notation ready for public review


Hi Trevor,

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems NR 1.6 Staff notation has
never been announced as ready for public review, although it seems to be
in good shape (thanks to Till) and has been reviewed by members of the
GDP team.  So I'll do it now.

Could all of you will a few minutes to spare please look through this
section at

http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Staff-notation.html#Staff-notation

and post any comments, corrections or criticism to this list.  Thanks.

I was planning on announcing this in a few days after looking it over
a few more times, but thanks for doing this.  It is definitely ready
for review.

Thanks,
Patrick




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to