Hi Frédéric,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 07:16:07PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I have tested the compilation of an orchestral score I found that it
> runs much slower with 2.12.1 than with 2.10.33 on the same machine
> running Windows XP SP2 (not using the cygwin version of lilypond):
>
> 2.10.33: 508 seconds
> 2.12.1: 872 seconds (+72%)
>
> I have run the same compilation 2 times giving the same time.
>
> Did you expect such slow down because of maybe new features?
>
> Also I had the following output with 2.12.1 which maybe explains the longer
> run:
>
> Finding the ideal number of pages...
> Fitting music on 44 or 45 pages...
> programming error: tried to space systems on a bad number of pages
> continuing, cross fingers
Are the compile times different if you compile your score with the
following option set?
\layout {
\context {
\Score
skipTypesetting = ##t
}
}
This will (slightly) help narrow down the possible causes of the
slowdown.
Thanks,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
