Hi Carl,

Option 3 is all standard scheme, and follows the documentation exactly. It's very easy for me to understand why and how it works, and easy for me to
modify and apply in different situations. […]
If I'm working in scheme, I should be working in scheme.

Thanks! I'll use #3 — and your recommendation re: Scheme-in-Scheme — from now on.

Best,
Kieren.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to