Frédéric
You are quite right.
I think what was finally done in 2.11 and 2.12 was to make \crescTextCresc
set crescencii persistently to text and \cresc do a once-only text
crescendo. There is a similar symmetry between
dimTextDim (persists) and \dim (once only)
but not between
\dimTextDecresc and \decresc
\dimTextDecr and \decr
because \decr is a synonym for \> and \decresc seems not to have been
implemented. This seems a pity, as the symmetry is broken. Perhaps this
should be corrected in 2.13.
The docs for 2.12 don't mention \cresc or \dim. This could (should) be
fixed now.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.b...@m4x.org>
To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: \crescTextCresc... 2.10 vs 2.12
Actually, it's the other way round: \setTextCresc was documented (and
meant)
to apply only to the next crescendo, although in reality it was never
reset
and its effect continued for all following crescendi. This behavior was
fixed
in 2.12 and the effect now really only applies to the next crescendo as
documented.
\setTextCresc worked very well for me in 2.10.33 on the next cresc only.
However with 2.12.2 (Windows), the following gives 2 times cresc:
{ \crescTextCresc c'2\< d'\! c'\< d'\! }
Frédéric
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user