>Side note: wouldn't it be possible to make <<{}\\{}>> an abbreviation to
>this? It is easier to write and remind.
I have these three entries in my definitions file:
vSpl = #(define-music-function (parser location vOne vTwo) (ly:music?
ly:music?)
#{ << { \voiceOne $vOne } \new Voice { \voiceTwo $vTwo } >> \oneVoice
#})
vSplDn = #(define-music-function (parser location vTwo vFour) (ly:music?
ly:music?)
#{ << { \voiceTwo $vTwo } \new Voice { \voiceFour $vFour } >> \voiceTwo
#})
vSplUp = #(define-music-function (parser location vOne vThree) (ly:music?
ly:music?)
#{ << { \voiceOne $vOne } \new Voice { \voiceThree $vThree } >>
\voiceOne
#})
Most of the time I use "\vSpl { e'4 } { c4 }" (and I'm just lazy enough to
have a macro in LPTool type it out for me and put the cursor inside the
first set of braces); occasionally I need them both down or up (sometimes
with \override Staff.NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t for a chord or
two). Perhaps someone has a more elegant solution?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Aligning-lyrics-when-music-portion-is-polyphonic-tp22254986p22258212.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
