Am 25.03.2009 um 14:54 schrieb John Mandereau:

James E. Bailey a écrit :
Am 25.03.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Graham Percival:
Nothing; they come from exactly the same source.  The version in
the AU is going to die soon, where "soon" means "within 4 months".


So then why the difference? I should think a one line command to get the source is easier and has a smaller margin of error than four lines.
Which release/Git revision of the docs are you referring to?

John


Oh sorry, I'm still working on what's on the website and the distributed documentation.
Documentation version 2.12.2 from 20 Jan 09
AU 1.2.1:
GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
    git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git

CG 1.1.2:
To get the main source code and documentation,
FIXME: test this!!!
    mkdir lilypond; cd lilypond
    git init-db
git remote add -f -t master -m master origin git:// git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git/
    git checkout -b master origin/master

BTW, I've tested it, it works.

From kainhofer:
AU 1.2.1:
GIT from git.sv.gnu.org
    git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git

CG 1.1.2:
To get the main source code and documentation,
mkdir lilypond; cd lilypond
git init-db
git remote add -f -t master -m master origin git://git.sv.gnu.org/ lilypond.git/
git checkout -b master origin/master

And then the website. (I'm sure this will change shortly[1])
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/#warning
Source code is available
    * By git from git.sv.gnu.org

             git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git


[1]Given Graham's definition of shortly
James E. Bailey



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to