>> Or would you object to such a syntax change?
>
> Only if it (adversely) affected the flexibility of whitespace
> elsewhere -- for example,
>
> g~ versus g ~
> g( versus g (
> etc.
I use `g ~' also
> If the parser is smart enough to isolate the duration-whitespace
> from anythingelse-whitespace, then it won't affect my (current)
> code.
AFAIK, there must not be any other expression between a note name (or
chord) and a rhythm specification, so I don't see problems.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
