2009/4/11 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:57:03PM +0200, Christ van Willegen wrote:
>> It seems that (parts of) Lily is in C++, which I've been using since >> 1995. So, I can read and (probably) bugfix in it. I guess I'll have to >> learn other languages on the way as well, including .ly (since it's >> changed a lot sometimes!) > > I would say that scheme is more important than C++. Also note > that you can do bugfixes in scheme without recompiling lilypond -- > this way you wouldn't need to mess around with any virtual > machines, C++ compilers, etc. In my experience of bugfixing, I'd say C++ is more important; I'd be surprised if the majority of issues in the tracker don't involve some C++ code. >> So, you can probably add me to the list of Frogs. Is there a 'central >> place' for new people to 'gather and discuss'? > > Yes, there's a Frog mailist, but I can't remember the address > offhand. If Valentin had his website up, I could find the address > there. http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/lilynet.net/frogs/ Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
