On 8/14/09 12:27 PM, "James E. Bailey" <derhindem...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.08.2009, at 19:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/14/09 9:54 AM, "James E. Bailey" <derhindem...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Though I reorganized them for 2.13. Hopefully you'll find this
>>>> version easier to read:
>>>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/index_54.html
>>>>
>>>> - Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you, incidentally, after some trial and error (after I sent the email)
>>> >> I
>>> figured that out. Although I should point out, neither documentation source
>>> says that the glyph names for the numbers don't begin with "scripts".
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The list of all glyphs says the numbers are "one", "two", etc. The fermatas
>> are "scripts.ufermata", "scripts.dfermata", etc.
>>
>> Where does this imply that the numbers should be "scripts.one", not "one"?
>> How could we make the documentation clearer?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>
>
> No problems, in the 2.12 documentation, b.6 The Feta font. The first sentence
> there is:
> The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be accessed
> directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" },
> see Formatting text.
>
> In the one on kainhofer it's section a.6 The Feta font:
> The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be accessed
> directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" },
> see Formatting text.
>
OK, I've tried to be more clear by referencing the glyph names "as shown in
the table below", and I've included two examples: the current segno example
and one that uses five.
The fix is now pushed to git.
Thanks
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user