On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:53 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > On Saturday 30 May 2009 10:23:31 pm Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > shortest note playing here.") > > > (shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? "The duration of the > > > shortest note that starts here.") > > > + (hide-tied-accidental-after-break ,boolean? "If set, an accidental > > > +that appears on a tied note after a line break will not be displayed") > > > (side-axis ,number? "If the value is @code{#X} (or > > > addr...@hidden@code{0}), the object is placed horizontally next to > > > the other object. If the value is @code{#Y} addr...@hidden@code{1}, it > > > is > > > > Joe, items in define-grob-properties.scm are sorted alphabetically. > > Please move it to the right location. > > Oops, I had originally named it show-tied-accidental-after-break. > > Thanks, > Joe > > Hi Joe, > I have a quick question about this property you've added (which is > wonderful, btw): > 1) Should tied accidentals after line breaks be suppressed by default?
I don't know; that was the previous default value, so I left it the same. I don't mind particularly if someone wants to change it. > I've looked through some scores, and even thought there's more examples > than I thought there would be that show tied accidentals after breaks > (mainly orchestral scores, and mainly 20th century pieces from the 70s) > it seems in the vast majority of cases they aren't shown. > > On a related note, I like your original property name above, but I guess it > would cause problems to change it now. Again, I won't object if someone else wants to change it (as long as there's a convert-ly rule). Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user