On 2009-10-11, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-10-11, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > I used that download but I didn't uninstall; I usually just remain
> > > the directory in Program Files before an install as I like to keep
> > > old versions readily to hand. This seems to be the difference
> > > between our experiences.
> >
> > That must be the reason: here's my own screenshot of the 2.13.4-1
> > installer on a "virgin" Vista64 box (that never had LilyPond
> > installed).
>
> BTW, this looks like the commit that changed the behavior:
And here is a patch to revert the change.
-Patrick
>From 2dbcd7705dcfaa93eedf9df8eb50616d4503a885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:48:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use LilyPond instead of GNU_LilyPond
There have been many complaints about this name change,
including the fact that it breaks LilyPondTool.
---
gub/installer.py | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gub/installer.py b/gub/installer.py
index 9330367..8977b12 100644
--- a/gub/installer.py
+++ b/gub/installer.py
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ from gub import commands
pretty_names = {
'denemo': 'GNU_Denemo',
'git': 'Git',
- 'lilypond': 'GNU_LilyPond',
+ 'lilypond': 'LilyPond',
'openoffice': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
'ooo-build': 'Go-Oo_OpenOffice.org',
}
--
1.6.5
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
