On 11/9/09 5:58 PM, "Hudson Flávio Meneses Lacerda"
<hfmlace...@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> While this may be syntactically valid LilyPond code, it seems to me to be
>> improper (i.e. to not match the intent of the input construction}.
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> Thanks for the correction. I have changed my code to:
>
> \new PianoStaff {
> <<
> \new Staff = cima { \Global \VozAguda }
> \new Staff = baixo { \Global \VozGrave }
>>>
> }
>
> (with no \\)
>
Excellent!
>
>
> BTW, I have found a strange behaviour of "modern" accidentals rule:
> LilyPond considers volta alternatives as "previous" measure. Is this
> correct? (Note the natural sign at the 2nd and 3rd alternatives, not
> related to the previous _played_ measure.)
I do not know. I am not an expert on the different accidental rules, nor on
the standard engraving practices for accidentals in alternatives. But I
would expect that the last measure of the repeat should serve as the
previous measure for each of the alternatives.
I've passed this message along to -user to get thoughts from those who are
much more knowledgeable than I.
>
> \version "2.13.7"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> {
> #(set-accidental-style 'modern)
> \repeat volta 3 {
> a'4 f'' d'' e''
> }
> \alternative {
> { d''2 cis'' }
> { \times 2/3 {c'8 e' g'} c''4 des'' c'' }
> { d''2 c'' }
> }
> }
>
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
