Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > David, > > I appreciate your persistence in this. I think that you are having part of > the difficulty in this conversation because it's on -user, not on -devel. > > The modifications to anything except input files (which use lilypond code > and embedded scheme) really involve knowledge that's primarily discussed on > -devel.
Certainly. This thread started by a user throwing in the towel, on the user list, explaining his reasons for doing so. This was followed by several comments that questioned his commitment in getting to learn Lilypond. As it is my impression that this in several respects was doing the original poster injustice as well as pasting over existing deficiencies in how Lilypond keeps up with what it is advertised for, I wanted to pitch in with my personal take. _Addressing_ the actual problems is definitely more suitably done on the developer list. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
