Let's say that it is--- what would the different structure look like?

--hsm

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Brett Duncan <bdd1...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> Hugh Myers wrote:
>>
>> Here is the 'close--- but not quite ready for cigar time' code that
>> I've cobbled together:
>>
>> \version "2.13.7"
>> %
>> % malaguena.ly -- q&d testbed for mixed notation score and tab.
>> %
>> \header {
>>  title = "Malaguena"
>>  subtitle = "none"
>>  composer = "Music by Unknown"
>> }
>>
>> eMinor = < e   b  gis  e b e, >
>> firstMono = { \eMinor \eMinor \eMinor }
>> firstPoly = {
>>  << { b c d } \\ { < gis, d e, >2. } >>
>>  << { d'4 c b } \\ { e,,2. } >>
>>  << { c''4 a b} \\ { a,2. } >>
>>  << { \acciaccatura d'8 c4 b a } \\ { a,2. } >>
>>  << { b'4 a c } \\ { g,2. } >>
>>  << { a'4 g f } \\ { f,2. } >>
>> }
>>
>> firstPolyRepeat = {
>>  << { r4 \times 2/3 {gis'8 b e } e,4 \times 2/3 {gis8 b e} e,2 }\\
>> {e,2.~e} >>
>> }
>> secondMono = {
>>  { e'8 [e'] gis, [e'] b [e] }
>>  { e,8 [e'] gis, [e'] b [e] }
>>  { a,8 [e'] c [e] b [e] }
>>  { a,8 [e'] g, [e'] f, [e'] }
>> }
>> thirdMono = {
>>  { e,8 [e'] gis, [e'] b [e] }
>> }
>>
>> {
>> \time 3/4
>> \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible
>> \bar ""
>> <<
>>  \new Staff \relative c'' {
>>    \firstMono
>>    \repeat volta 2 {
>>     \firstPoly
>>    }
>>    \alternative {
>>      { \firstPolyRepeat }
>>      { \secondMono }
>>    }
>>    \thirdMono
>>  }
>>  \new TabStaff \relative c' {
>>    \firstMono
>>    \repeat volta 2 {
>>     \firstPoly
>>    }
>>    \alternative {
>>      { \firstPolyRepeat }
>>      { \secondMono }
>>    }
>>    \thirdMono
>>  }
>>  }
>>
>> If you run this, you will see that the bar between the alternates is
>> single sided where it should be double sided. Likewise there is no bar
>> concluding the second alternative. Also a nit-pick, but the volta bars
>> are two long, should be one bar, not 'N' bars.
>>
>>
>
> Is the section from bar 10 to bar 14 repeated or not? If not, then the
> single sided repeat bar is correct. If bars 10-14 are repeated, then you'll
> need a slightly different structure for the repeats.
>
> Brett
>
>


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to