> 2009/11/27 -Eluze <elu...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> Philip Potter wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I'd like to get a direction for swung quavers at the top of my score. >>> What I want is: >>> >>> quaver-beam-quaver = triplet[ crotchet quaver ] >>> >> >> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=204 lsr helps: >> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=204
Ok I tried this out and it does the job great, thank you very much. I have some questions though: I seem to have to put this markup into a score. I am producing a score and parts: ie one score with all parts shown, and one separate part for each instrument. As a result, each instrument separately needs to include the swung quaver mark, and the score needs it too; but only once. If I put the swung quaver mark into each part, it produces the output I want, but I get warnings from lilypond: warning: Two simultaneous mark events, junking this one warning: Previous mark event here[8][16][24][32] because in the full score, each part is separately specifying a swung quaver markup at the same point. My questions are as follows: * is it possible to specify this markup at the staffgroup or book level, rather than at the score level, to avoid duplicate definition of marks and getting these warnings? * Is there any other way to do this in some more correct way which prevents warnings from being thrown up? It got me thinking about rehearsal marks which are implemented similarly: * If I want rehearsal marks to show up in the score and all parts, do rehearsal marks have to be specified within each part separately? Isn't this an unnecessary and error-prone duplication of information? Shouldn't these things be specified in one place only? I notice that if I put a \mark \default in part #1 at bar 2, but in part #1 at bar 3, then the full score has rehearsal mark A at bar 2 and B at bar 3; but the separate part for part #1 has A at bar 2 and nothing at bar 3, while the separate part for part #2 has A (not B!) at bar 3 and nothing at bar 2. This would happen if I put rehearsal marks in all parts but mistakenly misalign them -- everything suddenly goes totally screwy. Lilypond issues no diagnostics to report a problem here. Of course, to avoid printing the "wrong" rehearsal mark one can specify \mark #1 in both parts, and then you won't get an erroneous B mark; but then you lose the benefits of having the computer do the counting for you. Philip _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user