On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:50PM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > If you can suggest an improvement, especially in the > > Introduction pages, please do. > > LilyPondTool, Frescobaldi, Emacs and Vim are listed under > "Alternate Input." Since this link is to the right of "Text > Input," the implication is that they are alternatives to text > input, which of course is false: All the information under the > "Text input" link applies to these programs.
Hmm. I'm trying to tie these two together: text input and alternate input are both the same color, and end in "input". > Maybe change "Alternate Input" to "Input software," or "Input > programs," or "Progams, At least One of Which You Will Use to > Enter Your Scores if You At All Value Your Time and Sanity." I'm willing to change the name, but I'm not convinced that any of thsoe are more attractive than "alternate input". More to the point, the bottom of "text input" tries to direct people there, with the "easier editing environments" stuff. Hmm, on second thought, what about calling it "Easier editing"? That alliterates, so it gets a 20% bonus to its attractiveness. :) > (Maybe shorten that last one to "Programs..." and then it could > expand to the full phrase when you mouse over it.) No mouse-overs. It's an accessibilty problem. They're harder to translate. Blind people can't read them. It requires fine control over a pointer; I have difficulty controlling the trackpad on my netbook to hover over a small area. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
