Hu Haipeng wrote:
Why this compilation gets only two pages?
Mmm, that's my fault.
I commented out the midi generation to save time,
and I may have needed global-staff-size 6 in the initial stage
while I had done this incorrectly.
This size squeezes much more than you need, the second page has two systems.
It seems OK to use global-staff-size 9.
Peter's suggestion to start off \marks with
s2.*6 \break | s1*5/4*2 |
lets you keep global-staff-size 10 and fills the pages better.
But note that this probably works because measure 8 is tall,
i.e. it is just for this special case.
I see that the instrument names are extremely close to the edge of the
paper. A left-margin of at least 20\mm improves this.
(And 2.13 shortens the line-width to match.)
Cheers,
Robin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
