У нд, 2010-01-24 у 20:16 +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk пише: > У нд, 2010-01-24 у 18:27 +0100, Alexander Kobel пише: > > correct me if I'm wrong, but this looks like the A is actually higher > > than the other two, and has it's baseline exactly 1 staff-space unit > > above the top staff-line. So I guess the Y-offset is calculated w.r.t. > > the center staff line in 2.13 > Yes, looks like that. > > > (Joe: is this a bug?), > i'd say "looks like that", because internals reference says[1]: > "The vertical amount that this object is moved relative to its > Y-parent." > > > and you probably have to increase the values by 2. Anyway, what is "Y-parent" in provided example? The Staff?
This distance should be measured from "the nearest point of staff" or from "some reference point" (middle line?..) of a staff? (Or from the nearest point of the nearest neighboring object?..) I mean this can look like "intended change", not a regression or bug. Please, anyone? My problem is i don't know answers to above questions :-) (And do know where i could find them --- in the source --- but this is far too difficult to me, sorry,-) ps. Thats not a problem, i guess i can increase those values by 2, using bash, grep, xargs, sed... But i would like to know that this is really necessary :-) Thanks! -- Dmytro O. Redchuk _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
