On 1/24/10 7:42 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:39:51AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>>>> IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilypond file, so that
>>>>> people
>>>>
>>>> Well, IMO, it's better to have a short file in the body of the email.
>>>> Because that way I can look at it and identify errors without having to
>>>> save
>>>> an attachment and then open it up in another application.
>>>
>>> I don't *have* to save to attachment to just view it.
>>
>> That's nice. But like Carl, I find it easier to look at the file
>> in the body of an email.
>
> You can use an inline attachment for that, like this:
>
This is even worse for those of us who use digests. The email is split up
into one email plus two attachments, so we never see the end of the email.
I'd recommend that inline attachments never be used on a gnu mail list.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
