On 01.03.2010, at 06:03, George_ wrote:
I disagree. Once again citing my hypothetical 500-bar fugue, it seems
incomprehensible to me that there should not be a compromise
between the
autochange function and manual staff changes. It just blows my mind
that
something so feature-rich as Lilypond should skimp on such a simple
and
intuitively straighforward idea.
See Mats' suggestion.
On that note (no pun intended) using a spacer rest (r16*1/2
s16*1/2) screws
up the barcheck for the rest of the piece.
It shouldn't. make sure that the math adds up so that there are the
correct number of beats in the measure.
Agreed. The impression the docs give is certainly not one where I'm
clear on
the fact that either I leave it completely up to \autochange, or
the staff
changes are completely specified manually by me. And while both
extremes may
be useful in the short snippets that are in the docs, they are much
less
practical for the long, multivoice pieces that many Lilypond users
would
like to engrave.
I disagree. I use four variables, two which change staff and set
\voiceOne/\voiceTwo and two which simply change staff, \csd \csu \cu
\cd (or something like that) I have no problems inserting a manual
\csu whenever I need to, in pieces that are far longer than just 500
measures.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user