Yeah, that's right. One page is better. But the order is important. Also describing how "easy" or "difficult" a method is.
On 7 May 2010 11:59, Hugh Myers <hsmy...@gmail.com> wrote: > A somewhat pragmatic approach would be to use a single page suitably > subdivided if no scrolling is involved. Else use a two page solution. > The fewer pages a user has to link to the faster that person finds > what they are looking for. > > --hsm > > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Graham Percival > <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Colin Campbell has been working with me on the Introduction of the >> new website. However, we're still debating what to do with the >> "Easier editing" page: >> http://lilypond.org/website/easier-editing.html >> >> In particular, should we: >> 1) list all programs that help or produce lilypond input code on >> this page, or >> >> 2) only list a few programs here and list the rest elsewhere? >> (probably somewhere in Usage, with a link from this page >> to that location) >> >> When he began working, he had one opinion and I had the other. >> But over the past four months, we've switched positions like a >> finely-honed comedy act -- we still disagree, but we've both taken >> up the other person's initial position. >> >> The argument for #1: we have a unified place for people to look; >> it's easier to update; it's easier to find; etc. >> >> The argument for #2: it doesn't make sense to have algorithmic >> programming environments like Strasheela and FOMUS in the same >> list as Denemo, Frescobaldi, and LilyPondTool; having the extra >> options will only confused newbies; if we keep 4 or 5 >> "highlighted" programs in this list and move the rest somewhere >> else, it won't be much harder to maintain the list; etc. >> >> >> I'm not particularly looking for votes on this issue -- rather, >> I'm looking for reasons for (or against) #1 and #2 that we haven't >> thought of. It would be great if somebody said "we should do #x >> because XYZ" and then have us go "of course! XYZ! That makes >> everything totally clear; we all agree due to XYZ." >> >> >> If you have other concerns about the website, please don't mention >> them here. I'll be posting other questions once this issue is >> resolved. >> >> Cheers, >> - Graham >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user