Sorry Kieren,
Now that I looked through your example more closely and understood what it
does, I realized that it does the same as my \scaleDurations solution.
So it still produces six prolonged triplets (i.e. six eights over the
duration of three quarters) instead of nine triplets.
So there is still no - musically correct - solution at hand.
The problem with the tremolo is that in fact the two notes have to be
repeated 4 1/2 times.
As I basically only need to produce printed output, I can use the solution
for now, but I would still like to know if my problem can be solved with
LilyPond (I somewhat dislike workarounds that depend on faulty music).
Best
Urs
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
> Hi Reinhold:
>
>> You should be able to achieve this with
>> \times 6/9 { \repeat tremolo 3 {cis8 g }}
>
> Nice! My solution was definitely less elegant.
>
> But yours causes a barcheck failure at that duration -- it still needs to
> be augmented to be durationally correct:
>
> \version "2.13.18"
>
> tupletStuff = \relative b {
> \voiceOne
> \time 6/4
> \clef bass
> \times 2/3 { b8[ e b } \times 2/3 { e b e } \times 2/3 { b e b] } \times
> 6/9 { \repeat tremolo 3 { e8*3/2 b }} |
> c16 c c c
> }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff \tupletStuff
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Kieren.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Irregular-%229-tuplet%22-tremolo-notation-tp28502145p28502451.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
