No problem. :)
Regards,
Michael Morales,
thenewmikemo...@aol.com
On 9/6/2010 10:06 PM, Marc Schonbrun wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Michael wrote:
What I've normally done to make it clear is place the [ bracket directly after
the first d. See below.
\relative c' {
c8 d[ e f g a b c]
}
I feel this helps the clarity of the code, but this is what I do, I'm unsure of
anyone else.
Regards,
Michael Morales,
thenewmikemo...@aol.com
Michael,
It's a small tweak, but it does help. Thanks.
Marc
On 9/6/2010 9:47 PM, Marc Schonbrun wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about why the decision was made in the input syntax parser to
view beaming groups as follows:
}
\relative {
c8 d [e f g a b c]
}
The above snippet beams from the d through to the final c. At first glance, it
would appear that the brackets are encasing the e through c, and those notes
would end up beamed together, but, alas, this is not the case.
This is one of those things that I can happily learn, but it takes a pause to
get it right. Can someone comment on the history of this? I am simply curious.
Thanks,
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
