Dear Susan,
thanks a lot. I guess I understand it know, at least better than before-
2010/10/1 Susan Dittmar <susan.ditt...@gmx.de>
>
> Quoting Stefan Thomas (kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com):
> > Dear community,
> > strange enough, but
> >
> > > \input {./partone.tex}
> > >
> > works fine!
>
> Not strange at all.
>
> It will be processed in a two-stage run. First stage is lilypond-book,
> which produces partone.tex from partone.lytex and parttwo.tex from
> parttwo.lytex, replacing the lilypond code by something (La)TeX can handle.
>
> Then, in the second stage, pdflatex processes the master file (which did
> not need lilypond processing). This master file includes the output from
> the first stage, thus partone.tex and parttwo.tex.
>
> Had the master file lilypond code aswell, you would have had to rename the
> master file to master.lytex. Then you would process this file with
> lilypond-book to produce a (La)TeX file called master.tex. And then you
> would process the obtained master.tex file with pdflatex.
>
> Hope this helps in understanding,
>
> Susan
>
> --
> Lösungen sind der Aufrechterhaltung eines Problems abträglich. (Bodo Rulf)
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
