Hi all, 2010/12/10 Marco Correia <marco.v.corr...@gmail.com>: > Thanks! > > I can't believe that this is seen as a low priority enhancement...! This > completely renders lilypond unusable for the task I need it, which is to serve > as a printer for computer generated music. The output is not ugly - it is > plain wrong!
I agree with Marco, in my opinion this issue should be medium priority defect. Or even a high priority one (i took a look at current high priority defects and they don't look much grave than this one). Actually, i'd like to discuss issue classification in general, because in my opinion it could use a lot of improvement. Should i do this now on developers list, or maybe wait until 2.14 is out? Or wait for GOP? I don't want to disrupt current development process too much. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
