On 15 December 2010 16:06, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > And this is what the LSR preview shows. By default, I believe the LSR only > outputs a single line, and so that may be why you see more than we get with > the LSR. It can be set to give a whole page, but then this is a bit bigger > than optimal for this. As I said - I'm just concerned that this may > indicate that the lower marks aren't properly accounted for in the > sizing/positioning algorithms.
The image show why using extra-offset as a workaround is a very bad idea unless you're only tweaking small elements inside a stave: the ReheasalMark's bounding box doesn't move. Cheers, Neil
<<attachment: extra-offset-is-bad.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user