Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
#+inf.0 without any extra tweaks *should* work in all cases or not. If it
should then we have a bug and it should be reported as such.
yes, i think that the tweak definitely should work without further
tweaks. it looks more like a bug than anything else to me. but since
i'm not very knowledgeable about lilypond, i'm not confident to report
it as a bug.
So (and I apologise if you had already done this) can you provide the .ly
file you have where the \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 isn't enough?
by trial and error i found this as a minimal example. please note that
it's not consistent: in the first two measures all the beams are
horizontal, in the next two some are not.
\version "2.13.44"
\relative c'' {
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
}
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
