On 2/1/2011 12:02 PM, David Santamauro wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:27:17 -0800 (PST)
Jürgen Ibelgaufts<juri...@gmx.de> wrote:
David,
I agree. Still an ordinary G. Anyway, what I am looking for is a way
to name them differently in order to have different chord diagrams
and different names on the printed score to make clear to the
guitarist when he should use the one or the other.
Like I said, there are usually two distinct diagrams both labeled 'G'
but the second has a () or some note that it is a different voicing
(like my example below).
these aren't different G chords ... just different voicings. I have
seen them notated a variety of ways the most common being:
G G (type 2)
---- ----
320003 320033
320003 and 320033 are the diagrams, obviously.
David
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Why don't you create your own pre-defined chord diagram?
FYI, I did this for Violin and you could create your own for Guitar by
looking at the doc.
gMajor = { < g\4 d'\3 b' \2 g'\1 >1 }
gMinor = { < g\4 d'\3 bf'\2 g'\1 >1 }
\storePredefinedDiagram #default-fret-table \gMajor
#violinTuning
#"o;o;2-1;3-2;"
\storePredefinedDiagram #default-fret-table \gMinor
#violinTuning
#"o;o;1-1;3-2;"
Hope this helps.
-Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
