2011/3/20 Peter Chubb <pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au>: > On 20/03/2011, at 7:55 PM, Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've not checked, but is the license compatible with that of lilypond? >> A simple line stating "this file has the same license as the lilypond >> package" would serve. > > It's released under GPL version 2.0 > Its copyright is held by myself and by my employer, NICTA, who reserve the > right to release it under other licences at other times, and who wish the > notice of copyright in the file to be retained.
I am not an expert and can not decide if we can include it given that discrepancy. > I also assert my moral right to be identified as the original author of the > code, If your file says that, it will be respected. Don't bother about being a part of a commit done for another person. > Ultimately I expect all this not to be an issue, as the articulate script is > really a hack. Its functionality should really be part of the Performer > context. And I'm hoping that now that attention has been focussed more on > good MIDI output, someone will start hacking on that code to make the > articulate script obsolete. > > Peter C >> > -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user