Unfortunately, there is an obvious error in Bach Goldberg Aria bar 18 that I have seen propagated to several other versions that have used this as source. Not good.
-steve > 2011/4/8 Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> >> >> 2011/4/8 steve <st...@linuxsuite.org>: >> > Howdy! >> > >> > Â Hope this isn't too OT, but can't get any info anywhere else.. >> > >> > Â What is the status of the mutopiaproject http://mutopiaproject.org >> ?? >> > >> > Â I have discovered errors in goldberg aria, reported them to >> > all contacts, even added corrected source files. Also just >> > recently tried to subscribe to mailing list at mutopiaproject and >> > the subscription request(s) bounced!! Â This has been going on >> > for at least a year. No corrections, no acknowledgement, no contact >> > at all?? >> > >> > Â Â Is this project dead? >> >> Sadly yes it is, in practice. Â Latest updates are dec 2010 (four >> posts). Any posts previous to those 4 are a year old. Â I'd love that >> Petrucci Music Library http://imslp.org/wiki/ supported maintaining of >> source lilypond files in the same site. Â Sceaux and others just link >> to their own sites for sources. > > At least we can be thankful that the project website is still available... > >> Maybe it is a good thing that freely available scores mix scanned and >> typeset documents whatever their origin or the software used; but no >> doubt that completely free scores are only possible if you have the >> source _and_ the typesetting engine is free as in freedom (i.e. Finale >> documents are useless for me for a triple reason: I need a costly >> software to see them, even if a viewer is available at zero cost I >> still can not hack the score, and even if I could, I am not free >> because that viewer is prorietary software). > > Any Linux user has at least one more reason - finale doesn't run on > Linux... > > cheers, > Janek > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user