Paul Scott <waterhorse <at> ultrasw.com> writes:
> Why does the presence of \transposition change the effects of the
> following pairs of lines? Or how do I get the results I want when I add
> the desired \transposition command?
> notesA = \relative c'' {
> \transposition c'
> c1 d e f g
> }
> \addQuote "inA" \notesA
> \addQuote "inAd" \transpose c c, \notesA
The \transpose operation changes *all* the pitches in \notesA, including the c'
that tells LilyPond what the instrument \transposition is.
(\transpose really should not change this pitch, and there is a bug listed
about
this. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=754)
The effect is that \transpose will change the written pitches, but leave the
sounding pitches the same. Quotes with \quoteDuring use the sounding pitches.
I do not know a way to do what you want with \quoteDuring. (I just use
variables to hold short motives instead.) A similar issue must have been
handled to make the function \transposedCueDuring, so that might serve as a
model if any Scheme programmer (as many users seem to be) wants to find a
solution.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
