On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:30:15AM +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > Am 09.11.2011 17:31, schrieb David Kastrup: > >"Trevor Daniels"<t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: > > > >>This is a popular misconception, but it is wrong, as > >>you can see by introducing various accidentals. > >I was merely quoting the manual, so if you have something to complain, > >do it there. > > > "within a fourth" is equivalent to a distance of "three staff spaces > or less". Lilypond doesn't take accidentals into account (which is > of course a good thing).
Yes. A doubly-augmented fourth is in the same octave, whereas a doubly-diminished fifth is in a different octave. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
