Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't work, but it doesn't help much...
Thanks George On 1 December 2011 09:16, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com>wrote: > On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:08 PM, George_ wrote: > > > > > I'm confused by what the notation reference has to say about footnotes: > > > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/other > > > > Regarding the example for \auto-footnote and \footnote (they are > identical - > > why?), where do the 'b' and 'd' go? The text says that \auto-footnote > means > > "The footnote will be annotated automatically" (I don't understand what > this > > means either), whereas for \footnote this is not the case. But using > > \auto-footnote gives me an error saying the \auto-footnote is an unknown > > escaped string. > > > > For example: > > > > \markup { \auto-footnote "one" "two" } > > > > prints "auto-footnote one two" > > > > and > > > > \markup { \footnote "one" "two" } > > > > prints "one" with no footnote. > > > > I don't care at this point whether the note is a footnote or endnote, > I'll > > be happy with either - preferably a footnote, but given that I can't get > it > > to print anything, even a working endnote would be an improvement. > > Hey George, > > What version of LilyPond are you using? > > Cheers, > MS > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
