2011/12/9 Matthew Collett <m_coll...@ihug.co.nz>: > > On 9/12/2011, at 2:27 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > >>> On 8/12/2011, at 10:48 pm, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>>> Please, *never*, *never*, *never* send a "courtesy copy" of a public >>>> answer as a private mail when answering on a mailing list unless you >>>> have been _explicitly_ asked to provide such a copy. >>> >>> Normally I'd agree with you, but in fairness to Paolo I observe that >>> this is the only mailing list I am or ever have been a member of in >>> which the default behaviour is to reply to the sender (only) rather >>> than to the list. I have in consequence more than once >>> unintentionally sent a separate "courtesy copy" message. >> >> You arae confusing a _separate_ "courtesy copy", namely one for which >> the _only_ recipient in the headers is the person you are replying to, >> with _including_ the intended recipient in the list of recipients of the >> _same_ mail. > > No, I am not: a separate message is what I said, and what I meant. Because > the list reply defaults to the sender _only_, unless I remember explicitly to > choose "Reply All" (which I otherwise rarely use) any message I mean to send > to the list goes instead to just the individual. I then have to send a > separate copy to the list (only), making my first reply retrospectively and > unintentionally a "courtesy copy". The last occasion that happened was just > yesterday. And as I said, I do not have this problem with any other mailing > list.
+1 .. Sorry Matt, I did it again... Jakob. > > Best wishes, > Matthew > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
