On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:15:17 +0000 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:05:03AM +0100, Nils wrote: > > Are you serious? This was the most harmless picture you can imagine. > > I find nothing objectionable about it, but we should bear in mind > that cultural norms vary quite a bit; Europeans are generally much > more accepting of nudity than North Americans. We also have a > fair chunk of clergy using lilypond, and again, different > denominations of different religions will have greater or lesser > acceptance of nudity. > I think the link was fine but it would have been good to add NSFW > (not safe for work); that's the general custom these days to > denote pictures which may be objectionable for some people. > > - Graham > It is not that I'm posting these things on a daily basis. Not even a yearly. But I have to say that my blog got a boost of 1740% (yes, thousand) in visitors because of that picture. NSFW is a fair warning, right. Nils P.S. And many of the new visitors were from this list. I guess this would be the clergy :) Next time I will aim for the doubled increase by not using grown women but boys. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
