On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, James <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Frescobaldi has a heap more useful features though for serious use than this > experimental website - that's not to disparage what is done here, it's a nice > piece of work. > > The Implication that Mr Kulp made was basically not having to keep opening a > PDF separately from the editor. >
Frescobaldi looks nice (although the pdf preview didn't work for me), I didn't mean to say anything against it. What I like about the web app is that one needn't install anything. I personally use vim and a shell script of my own for previewing. I wouldn't use either Frescobaldi or the web app for myself, I just meant the web app is great to give super-quick intro without having to install anything. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://jonathankulp.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
