Am 24.05.2012 14:14, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
c8 c c c c c
r c c c c c
}
It apparently is different from 2.14.2, but I would not call this a
regression.
In 3/4, I would like to have 6 eights beamed together, but if any
rests are involved, the beaming should be per quarter in order to
preserve the 3-beat character. In:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
r4 r8 c c c
}
the default beaming in 2.14.2 gives an impression of a 2-beat,
which should
be avoided.
Toine Schreurs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Just one comment, a question that I had several times when reading
such reports.
Don't know if this applies here, but:
A regression is something that doesn't work in a later version and
that has _deliberately_ worked in a previous version. I.e. something
that has once been fixed to work in that specific way.
If it just was correct and isn't anymore, it isn't considered a
regression but just a newly introduced bug.
Best
Urs
Still a regression. Any change in behavior that is not fully
accounted for in the change log and that you feel leads to worse
behavior than a previous version is a regression. People can then
either report it as a change, at which point it is a feature, or they
can fix it, at which point the old functionality is restored.
Reverting to the previous behaviour is simply a matter of
\set beamExceptions = #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (6)))))
Nick
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Well, not having followed this too closely:
I have the impression that you experience an effect or side effect of
the heavily changed beaming.
It this is the case, could you please check if this is documented? Maybe
you overlooked something.
Or maybe there's need for a documentations suggestion?
Best
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user