Am 03.06.2012 16:42, schrieb Federico Bruni:
This question is related to a bug report I sent some hours ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-06/msg00022.html
Try to compile the attached file with 2.14.2 and 2.15.39 or git version.
You'll see that in latest version the slurs connect noteheads, even if
\voiceOne is specified. I like this output (even if it breaks the
slurs position in TabStaff).
However, as soon as a beaming appears, the slurs go up the beams and
away from noteheads. I guess that this is due to \voiceOne.
There's a way to keep the slurs close to noteheads? Is it a good
intended output?
IIUC, the only way to keep the slurs close to the note heads is
to specify \slurDown | \slurUp *after* \voiceOne | \voiceTwo,
or you specify the stem direction by "_" or "^", respectively.
b8^( c) or b8_( c)
But in your specific case, the slurs will overlap in the space between
upper and lower
voice, so this looks o.k. only in cases where the two voices have a
suitable distance.
Elaine Gould uses both ways of stem placement according to the distance
of the
two voices and the readability in presence of other signs and symbols
like fingerings,
accents etc.
HTH,
Marc
When I write polyphonic music I must specify \voiceOne and \voiceTwo
in order to avoid clashes.
Thanks,
Federico
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
