Jeff Barnes <jbarnes...@yahoo.com> writes: >> From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> >> >>On 30/05/12 02:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >>> One of the problems of LilyPond is that C++ had very poor support for >>> things we desperately need: reflection, automatic memory management >>> and callbacks. >> >>How about D? > > Also, consider Qt. It has all of the above. Qt makes it pretty easy > for devs who started out with higher-level languages to become > productive in C++.
And while we are discussing GUI developing frameworks, we should not lightly discard Visual Basic. Let's shelve this discussion for the current point of time. I am not exactly convinced it is making progress focusing on goals that are both attainable as well as desirable from a technical point of view. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
